Home Pricing Docs Compare SDK Blog Changelog Status Get API Key →
Music API · Comparison

FreqBlog vs ReccoBeats

July 2026 · 5 min read · FreqBlog

FreqBlog vs ReccoBeats: an honest comparison

Both APIs exist to fill the same gap: Spotify deprecated its public audio-features endpoint, and teams still need tempo, key, energy and mood for real tracks. The honest question a buyer asks is: “Which one fits how I actually identify tracks, and can I trust who is behind it?” This page sticks to publicly verifiable facts from each product’s own site and docs, and points you to ReccoBeats where it is genuinely the better fit.

At a glance

DimensionFreqBlogReccoBeats
How you resolve a track By name + artist, ISRC, MusicBrainz ID, or Spotify ID — no Spotify ID required. Docs state /track?ids= “supports both ReccoBeats IDs and Spotify IDs” (a Spotify Base-62 string or a ReccoBeats UUID); no track-name or ISRC lookup is documented.
Features without owning the audio Look up by name/ISRC/ID with no audio upload. Catalogue features are fetched by track ID; to analyse a track outside the catalogue you upload the audio file yourself to POST /v1/analysis/audio-features.
On-miss backfill Auto-ingests an unmatched track on first request, then returns computed features. No on-miss ingestion is documented; the audio-features endpoint lists 404 for tracks that are not found.
Fields returned 42 fields including BPM, musical key (name + Camelot + Open Key), energy, mood, genre, ISRC and MBID. Documented Spotify-parity set: acousticness, danceability, energy, instrumentalness, liveness, loudness, speechiness, tempo, valence.
Harmonic / DJ set-building Camelot-aware set tools: /transition scoring, /next-track and /setlist ordering. Offers a track-recommendation endpoint (/v1/track/recommendation) based on song attributes; no Camelot harmonic set-builder is documented.
Hosted MCP server for LLMs/agents Hosted MCP endpoint at mcp.freqblog.com/mcp. No hosted MCP server is documented on the site.
Operator disclosure Operated by Steven Birring, Nuneaton UK, ICO-registered — a sole trader trading as Stackbase/FreqBlog. Footer credits “Copyright © 2025 LatteBits”; no individual operator, registered business identity, or jurisdiction is named.

Every ReccoBeats cell above reflects its own public site and documentation at the time of writing; product details can change, so verify against the live docs.

When ReccoBeats is the better fit

ReccoBeats is a good choice in a few concrete situations:

Why teams pick FreqBlog

FreqBlog is built for teams that identify music the way people actually talk about it — by name and artist — and that want to know who stands behind the data.

FAQ

Do I need a Spotify ID to use FreqBlog?

No. You can resolve a track by name + artist, ISRC, MusicBrainz ID, or Spotify ID. ReccoBeats’ documented lookup keys are a Spotify ID or a ReccoBeats UUID.

What happens when a track isn’t in the catalogue?

FreqBlog backfills the track on demand and returns computed features. ReccoBeats’ audio-features endpoint documents a 404 for tracks it can’t find, and offers a separate upload-based extraction endpoint if you already have the audio file.

Can an LLM or agent call these APIs directly?

FreqBlog publishes a hosted MCP server at mcp.freqblog.com/mcp for LLMs and agents. ReccoBeats does not document a hosted MCP server on its site.

Is FreqBlog free?

FreqBlog has a free tier of 1,000 requests per month with no card required, then roughly £0.17 per 1,000 requests. ReccoBeats states it offers completely free API access, subject to internal rate limits — so if cost is your only criterion, ReccoBeats is worth a look.

Compare with others